Itta/527/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi v. Sri Aditya Goel
High Court
05 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/527/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi v. Sri Aditya Goel
Date of order
05 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/527/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Vi v. Sri Aditya Goel, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, we dismiss this appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.527 of 2014
DATED:5.8.2014
Between:Commissioner of Income Tax,-IV,Hyderabad.And
… Appellant
Sri Aditya Goel,Proprietor M/s. Vrindavan Steels,Hyderabad.
….Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.527 of 2014
Judgment :(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
By the impugned judgment and order, the learned Tribunalhas interfered with the order of the Commissioner in exercisingjurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Thelearned Tribunal, on analyzing the record found that the AssessingOfficer having applied his mind, taken a plausible view under thelaw.
It is settled position of law that exercise of jurisdiction underSection 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax is permissibleonly when there is total non-application of mind and absurd andunacceptable view is expressed. These conditions are notsatisfied in this case.
Hence, we dismiss this appeal.
The miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall alsostand closed. No costs.
__________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR,
J
5[th] August, 2014pnb
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.