Case LawHigh Court › Itta/53/2009 Of M/S. Vjil Consulting Ltd...

Itta/53/2009 Of M/S. Vjil Consulting Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward -3(2), Hyderabad

High Court 31 Jul 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/53/2009 Of M/S. Vjil Consulting Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward -3(2), Hyderabad
Date of order
31 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/53/2009 Of M/S. Vjil Consulting Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward -3(2), Hyderabad, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

[ [348s ]] IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND PRESENT THE HON'BLE [SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HON'BLE [JUSTICE S, ] l.T.T.A.No: 53 0F [2009] Appeal under [section 260-4 ][of the ][lncome ][Tax' Act ][against ][the ][order ][dated]31-08-2OOg [in ][l.T,A.No.203 ][tHydt2}O9 for the ][Assessment Year 2005-06 on ][the ][file ][of]the lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ]["8" Bench' ][Hyderabad] Between: M/s. VJIL Consulting 1956 [Ltd, ]hlu-"-p '[a ]ng-itt't"gitt"t6o [Company registered ][office ][under ][at ][# ][the ][1-8-'165' ][provisions ][Usha ][of ][Kiran'][the];;;p*;t-i;t, S.D.Road, [Secunderabadl ]OV itt [ft'f ]Director' Mr' M [Satyendra' ][S/o]'naging Sri M. Mailesnam, [Age-42 ][yeas, ][R/o' ][Hyderabad ] ...A,'ELLANT AND lncome Tax [Officer, ][Ward ][-3(2), ][Hyderaba][ d] ...RESPONDENT t.A. NO:[10F][ 2009{ITTAMP. ] [ : ][349 ][OF 2009)]that in the [circumstances ][stated]P&ition under [S][ection ][151 ] [PraYing]e High Court [maY ][be ]Pleased [to]in the affidavit [filed ][in][ support of ][the ][Petition, ][th]pass an order [staying][ the ][demand ][of ][Rs ][64,41],4741- [disputed in the ][aPPeal ][for]the assessment Year [2005-06] Counsel for [the Appellant: ][Ms' ][Sahithi, representing Mr' ][Pushyam ][Kiran] Counsel for [the Respondent: Ms' B' ][Sapna Reddy' ][(Sr' ] [FOR INCOME TAX)] The Court [delivered ][the ][following: ] .\' THE HONOURABLE SRJ JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. CHALAPATHI RAOI.T.T.A.No.53 of2009 JUDGM ENT (l\,r Hon'l c Sri Jtrstice p.Sam ktshv) Heard Ms. Sahithi, iearned counsel representing Mr. pushyamKiran, lear:ned counsel for the appellant and lls. B. Sapna Reddy,learned Senior Standrng Counsel for Income Tax Departmerrtappearing for the resporident. perused the record. 2. 2. Leamed counsel appearing for the appellant submits that thedispute has bcen settled by the appellant under Vivad Se Visl.Lr.vasScher-ne arrd hence, the appellant does not intend to pursue theappeai an.,, frrrt ire:.. .,Ar:corrlingli,, il.re appeai stands closeci Consecluently, rniscellaneous petitions pending, iI. anir, shall stand closed SD/. R.KARTHIKEYANOINT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad "8" Bench, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Mr Pushyam Kiran, Advocate 3. One CC to Ms B. Sapna Reddy(Sr SC FOR INCONIE TAX) 4. Two CD Copies kii.iri/P S L HIGH COURT DATED:31 10712025 JUDGMENTITTA.No.53 of 2009 CLOSING THE APPEAL C,6eYu,*r-,-^\D [*]?\A' ,--i-: =--=_'---..\,1i;i1..,s [.- ]' t\t/'ri' ., ;i [1A ]SEp 1yn
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan