In Itta/533/2012 Of Aditya Waghray v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.533 OF 2012
DATED:19.6.2013
Between:
Aditya Waghray … Appellant
And
The Additional Commissioner of Income TaxRange-5, 6[th] FloorAayakar BhavanHyderabad … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAAND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. NO.533 OF 23012
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and afterperusing the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal, weare of the view that this matter is not required to be admitted for hearingas the impugned order has been passed remanding the matter forfresh hearing. But, fresh hearing has been directed to be made basedon certain observations as recorded by the Tribunal.
We modify slightly the order of the learned Tribunal to the extentthat hearing on remand back shall take place afresh and not basing onthe observations of the learned Tribunal.
The appeal is accordingly disposed of. There will be no order asto costs.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
______________________
G. ROHINI, J 19.6.2013
bnr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.