Itta/535/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. P.r.gopala Krishna Reddy
High Court
05 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/535/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. P.r.gopala Krishna Reddy
Date of order
05 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/535/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. P.r.gopala Krishna Reddy, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.535 of 2014
DATED:5.8.2014
Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Hyderabad.
And
… Appellant
P.R. Gopala Krishna Reddy,Hyderabad.
….Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.535 of 2014
Judgment :(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We dismiss the appeal as there is no element of law to bedecided in this case as the learned Tribunal on fact found that theassessee explained that the property at Mysore has beenpurchased by his grand son, Sri Sravan Kumar by taking a loanof Rs.25.00 lakhs from him. Further the amount ofRs.2,75,000/- has been taken for registration and stamp duty fromhis wife. These are reflected in the books of accounts andsubstantiated by the assessee.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if anypending, shall also stand closed. No costs.
__________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR,
5[th] August, 2014
pnb
J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.