Case LawHigh Court › Itta/535/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/535/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. P.r.gopala Krishna Reddy

High Court 05 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/535/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. P.r.gopala Krishna Reddy
Date of order
05 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/535/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. P.r.gopala Krishna Reddy, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.535 of 2014 DATED:5.8.2014 Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Hyderabad. And … Appellant P.R. Gopala Krishna Reddy,Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.535 of 2014 Judgment :(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We dismiss the appeal as there is no element of law to bedecided in this case as the learned Tribunal on fact found that theassessee explained that the property at Mysore has beenpurchased by his grand son, Sri Sravan Kumar by taking a loanof Rs.25.00 lakhs from him. Further the amount ofRs.2,75,000/- has been taken for registration and stamp duty fromhis wife. These are reflected in the books of accounts andsubstantiated by the assessee. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if anypending, shall also stand closed. No costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, 5[th] August, 2014 pnb J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan