Case Law › High Court › Itta/538/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/538/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Y. Shivalinga Prasad

High Court 05 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

05 Jul 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/538/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Y. Shivalinga Prasad, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ___________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A.No.538 of 2011 DATED: 5.7.2013 Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad. … Appellant AndY. Shivalinga Prasad,Hyderabad. … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A.No.538 OF 2011 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) Though Certified Copy of the order has not been furnished in this matter, buthaving gone through the plain copy of the order, we are of the view that even onmerits, the appeal is not liable to be sustained as this matter has been decided purelyon question of fact. No element of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ G. ROHINI, J 05.07.2013 pnb

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.