Case LawHigh Court › Itta/54/2009 Of Ad-Age Outdoor Advertisi...

Itta/54/2009 Of Ad-Age Outdoor Advertising P Ltd., Hyderabad v. Deputy Commissioneer Of Income Tax, Hyderabad

High Court 22 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/54/2009 Of Ad-Age Outdoor Advertising P Ltd., Hyderabad v. Deputy Commissioneer Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Date of order
22 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2006-2007
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/54/2009 Of Ad-Age Outdoor Advertising P Ltd., Hyderabad v. Deputy Commissioneer Of Income Tax, Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR JyS.rJfJIDo [rE LANGANA]^, THURSDAY, THE TW TWc o NDDA Yo F A PR I L,*o rn o r.oilxrl*T THE HoNouRABLE sRr JPRESENTTHE HONOUR^"' $Tf,.T: T ffi"JiH:: [*"] INCO ME TAX TRIBU NAL APPEAL NO:54 F 2009 Income Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the Income Tax Apperate Trrbunar, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad in rATNo ' 1 769/Hyd/2oog for Assessment year 2006-2007 dated 27r1oro9 preferred againstthe order of the Income Tax Apperate Trrbunar, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad in rATNo ' 1 769/Hyd/2oog for Assessment year 2006-2007 dated 27r1oro9 preferred againstthe order of the commissioner of Income Tax (Appears)-r, Hyderabad, Appear No.rrA0074/clr(A)-lli08-09 dated 24r1or2oo8 preferred against the order of the Assistantcommissioner of rncome Tax circre,r(1) PAN/GrR No.AABCA 7159/A/Ag5 dated26/03/200826/03/2008 Between: AD-AGE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING PVTLTD., Plot No.181/A, MLA Cotony, RoadNo.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad,..APPELLANT AND ASSISTANT COIVI\4ISSIONEER OF TNCOI\,IE TAX, Circte 1 [1], Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant : SRI RAVINDRA CHENJICounsel for the Respondent :Counsel for the Respondent : The Court made the following: ORDER HONOURABLE [M.S.RAMACHANDRA ] AND HONOURABLE [JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR] IT'IA.No. 54 of [2OO9] JUDGMENT:r Si Justice [M.S.Ramachandra ][Rao)] Counsel for the appellant [has filed ][a ][Memo]dt"l2.O4.2A2I seeking [permission ][of the ][Court ][to]withdraw the appeal to settle [the ][matter ][with ][the]authorities under Vivaad Se Vishwas [Act,2O2O.] 2. Granting permission as sought for,, this Appeal isdismissed as [q,ithdrawn. ]No order as to cos;ts 3. Consequently, rniscellaneous petitions pending, tfany, shali stand closed. Sdi.K.SREENIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARG,,SECTION OFFICER ,TRUE COPY// To1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "B" Hyderabad.2. One CC to Sri Ravindra Chenji, Advocate (OPUC)3. Two CD Copies}YKi.u HIGH COURTDATED22l0412021 ORDERITTA.No.54 of 2009 DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN THE ITTA. l- -.4\)r'tl^tv s(\|\i
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan