Case LawHigh Court › Itta/545/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/545/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Spandana Rural And Urban Development Organization

High Court 10 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/545/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Spandana Rural And Urban Development Organization
Date of order
10 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/545/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Spandana Rural And Urban Development Organization, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 304 of 2013,the present appeal is dismissed, as the issue involved isidentical.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI I.T.T.A. No.545 OF 2011 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax,Rajkamala Complex,Laxmipuram, Guntur ..... Appellant AND Spandana Rural and Urban Development Organisation,Mangalagiri Road, Guntur. .....Respondent The Court made the following : JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta) In view of dismissal of Appeal in ITTA No. 304 of 2013,the present appeal is dismissed, as the issue involved isidentical. No order as to costs. July 10, 2013MAS ______________________ Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ. __________ G.Rohini, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan