Case Law › High Court › Itta/545/2014 Of The Director Of Income...

Itta/545/2014 Of The Director Of Income Tax(Exemptions) v. The Agriculture Market Committee

High Court 06 Aug 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

06 Aug 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/545/2014 Of The Director Of Income Tax(Exemptions) v. The Agriculture Market Committee, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, this appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 545 of 2014 Date: 06.08.2014 Between: The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions),Hyderabad. … Appellant And The Agricultural Market Committee,Kubeer, Adilabad District. … Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 545 of 2014 ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) It is submitted by Sri J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for theappellant, that an identical appeal being ITTA.No.346 of 2014 has beendismissed by this Court on 11.06.2014. Hence, this appeal is also dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.