Case Law › High Court › Itta/548/2010 Of M/S. Rashtriya Ispat Ni...

Itta/548/2010 Of M/S. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam v. The Asst.commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cricle-3(1),Visakapatnam

High Court 20 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · aphc

Parties

Date of order

20 Mar 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/548/2010 Of M/S. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd., Visakhapatnam v. The Asst.commissioner Of Income-Tax,Cricle-3(1),Visakapatnam, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, this Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND HON’BLE SRI B.KRISHAN MOHAN I.T.T.A.No.548 of 2010 ORDER: (per UDPR,J) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Appeal. 2. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. 20.03.2021 KLPD _________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J ______________________ B.KRISHNA MOHAN, J HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND HON’BLE SRI B.KRISHAN MOHAN I.T.T.A.No.5478of 2010 20-03-2021 KLPD

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.