Itta/550/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Agri Gold Foods And Farm Products Ltd
High Court
28 Oct 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/550/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Agri Gold Foods And Farm Products Ltd
Date of order
28 Oct 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/550/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Agri Gold Foods And Farm Products Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforestated.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V. SESHA SAI
I .T.T.A.No.550 of 2016
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department would submit that in terms of CBDT Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015, all appeals where the tax effect is below Rs.20,00,000/- are required to be withdrawn and as the value of the present appeal is less than Rs.20,00,000/-, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel would further submit that liberty may be granted in case it were to be found later that the subject matter of the appeal falls within the exceptions mentioned in the aforestated Circular issued by the Central Board to file an application for restoration of the appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforestated. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_______________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
_____________________
A.V. SESHA SAI , J Date:28.10.2016
GJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.