Itta/55/2008 Of M/S. Hema Wines, A Partnership Firm v. The Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI |.T.T.A.No: 55 of 2008 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961arising out of the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B [']Hyderabad, in ITA No.239/Hyderabad/2007, for assessment Year 2004-2005 dated24-05-2007 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax(Appeals), Vijayawada, Appeal No.27OIKMM/ClT(4)A//06-07, dated:27-'11-2006,preferred against the Order of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward-1, Khammam, GIRNo. H-308, dated 22-9-2006. Between: It//s. Hema Wines, a Partnership Firm, represented by its Managing Partner Sri LSrinivasa Reddy, Main Road, Madhira, Khammam District. ...AppellantSrinivasa Reddy, Main Road, Madhira, Khammam District. ...Appellant AND ...Respondent The lncome Tax Officer, Ward l, Khammam l.A. NO: 2 OF 2008(ITTAMP. NO: 65 OF 2008) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased togrant stay of all. further proceedings pursuant to the demand raised by thelncome Tax Officer, Ward-1, Khammam, [pursuant ]to his order daled 22-09-2OOBfor the Assessment Year 2004-05 as restored by its order dated 24-05-2007 bythe lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, [pending ]disposal of the ITTA. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI P. CHANDRA SEKAR REDDY (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI [P.SA]U ] AND THE HON'BLE SRI [N.TUKARAMJI] I.T.T.A.No.55 of2OO8 JUDGMENT:[(per Hon'bte ][Si ][Justice P.SAIfi KOSHY)] In the last many [days, there ][is ][no ][representation ][on ][behalf of]the appellant. [Even ][when ][it ][was taken ][up ][on ][22'll'2o23' ][we ][have]reluctantly adjourned [the matter to ][be ][taken ][up ][on a ][later ][date ][Today]also there is no [representation ][on ][behalf ][of ][the appellant when ][the]matter is taken up, [even ][in ][the post noon ][session'] 2. ln the given circumstances, [it ][appears ][that ][the appellant ][and]thc counsel have [Iost ][interest ][in ][contesting ][tJle ][appeal'] 3. Accordingly, the [present appeal ][is ][dismissed ][for ][want ][of]prosecution. Interim relief [granted ][earlier ][also stands vacated, ][if ][any']No costs. miscellaneous [petitions, ][pending ][if ][any, ][sha11] ConsequentlY, stand closed. sD'- [M' ]JVTJAYA [33,ti[E[]f.' /'TRUE [coPY'// ] sECTloN To,1.2.34ui[ffiih4'ffi [ffisffi ][{,fit#::":::::"]roPUCl5Two CD [CoPtes] 5 kam Lv$ HIGH DATED: [08101t2024] JUDGMENTITTA.No.SS [of ][2008] THE APPEAL FOR NON.PROSECUTION vs\o[vq] HE [STA)]s(q5rloI'13 [FiS ][202{]O::t