Itta/560/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S Jagadamba Pearls Dealers
High Court
06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/560/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S Jagadamba Pearls Dealers
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/560/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. M/S Jagadamba Pearls Dealers, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrarvn interms of the litrerty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE TWO THOUSAND
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE ANDTHE HON'BLE [JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO]
INCOME TAX [NO: ][560][ oF ][2013]
lncome tax Tribunal [Appeal under Section ][260-4 ][of ][the ][lncome tax ][Act' ][1961']against the [order of ].the [lncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench ]["A"']Hyderabad [in l.TA.No. ][89tHydl2O12 ][for ][Assessment ][Year ][2006-07 ][dated ][17-06-]2013 [preferred against the order ][of ][the ][commissioner ][of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vll']Hyderabaddated30-12-201,linl.T.A.No.1242tDclTCC-4/C|T(A)-Vll/2010.11'the [order ][of ][the ][Deputy Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][' ][Central]preferred against Circle 4, [Hyderabad daled3l-12-2010 ][in ] [No ]
Between:
Commissioner [Of ][lncome Tax-V, lT Towers' ] [Guards' ][Hyderabad']
...APPELLANT/ [ResPondent]
AND7 -2-7 55, Pot [Market, Secunderabad']M/s. Jagadamba [Pearls ][Dealers,]
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for [the ][Appellant: ]'siii.v. [Ms' ][B' ][SAPNA REDDY' ][Junior ] [representing]pnnsaD, sENloR sc FoR l'T' DEPARTMENTCounsel forthe [Respondent: ] [A' ][V' ] The Court [Delivered the ][following ][Judgment ][:]
TTIE HON'BLE TIIE CHIEF JUSTICE AI,OK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JTISTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.56O of 2013
JUDGMENT: ip(,t [the ]tror [,bte ]the Chef Justbe ALok Aradhe)
Ms. B.Sapna Reddy, learned Junior StandingCounsel representing Mr. J.V.prasad, learned SeniorStanding Counsel for Income Tax Department for theappellant.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of thisCourt to withdraw the appeal in the light of the CircularNo.O9/2024, dated 17.09.2024, with the liberty to revivethe same in case the subject matter of the appeal falls inany of the exceptions provided in the Circu lar No.5/2O24dated 15.O3.2024.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrarvn interms of the litrerty as prayed for.
II
Miscellaneous applications [pending, ][if ][any, ][shall]
stand closed. [However, ][there shall ][be ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs']
A.V.S.S.C.S.M. JOINGISTRAR
//TRUE
SECN OFFICER
To1. The lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal' ][Hyderabad'.Bench ]["A"' ][Hyderabad ][']2: i't. ['bl-."iissiondi ][or ][rnJorn" ][i"i ][(A[peals)' ][vll' ][Hvderabad]3. The Deputy [commissio'n?ii ][ri'-"tlitlit" ]' [i-entral'Circle ][4' ][Hvderabad]4- one [to ][Sri J.V. ][prasad'senior ] [lor ][lJ' ][Dept' ][(-qly'C]']56sffi B3 i: 7. Two ' . Two Two [ ][[GoPies]]'d*i^i''ls,l11u*tf,llffltf"'isffieuc1
67. Two ' . Two Two [ ][[GoPies]]7. Two ' . Two Two [ ][[GoPies]]
kul/gh
I
I
HIGH COURTDATED:06/0,t/2025
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.560 ot 2013
DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITI{DRAWN.
:=:-,., J'qr'--\-.,\/)i':l31 ,tAl l,iii...-\-!c,q f,l,T,-^.t\i:;a-.ri'/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.