In Itta/561/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ch.ranga Rao And Others, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the facts and circumstances, we are inclined to dismiss theappeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOITTA No. 561 of 2011Dated: 19-12-2012
Between:Commissioner of Income Tax,Visakhapatnam
And
Ch. Ranga Rao and others.
…Appellant
…Respondents.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ITTA No. 561 of 2012
Judgment:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
Heard Sri S.R.Ashok, learned Senior counsel for the appellant.
This is an appeal preferred by the Revenue against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench dated 31-8-2011 pertaining to the Assessment Year 1993-94. The delay inrepresentation of the appeal was condoned on 22-7-2003 and noticeon the appeal was ordered on 4-9-2003 and thereafter from time totime the matter was adjourned to enable the appellant-Revenue toserve notice of this appeal on the respondents. However despiteseveral opportunities notice on the respondents-assessees of thisappeal could not be served.
In the facts and circumstances, we are inclined to dismiss theappeal. No costs.
_________________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
28[th] August, 2012
GRR
_______________________________
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.