Itta/568/2006 Of M/S. Kanumuri Holdings Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABADTUESOAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANAALISHETTY INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 568 OF 2006 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act,against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B',Hyderabad in ITA No.1247lHYDl2O03, for assessment Year 2000-01 dated22.06.2006 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome TaxAppeals-|, Hyderabad, Appeal No. 0011/CC-1, HYD/C|T(A)-1103-04 dated10.11.2003, preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome{axCentral Circle -1, Hyderabad, PAN/GlR No. K-1IDCIT/CC-1 dated 07.03.2003against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B',Hyderabad in ITA No.1247lHYDl2O03, for assessment Year 2000-01 dated22.06.2006 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome TaxAppeals-|, Hyderabad, Appeal No. 0011/CC-1, HYD/C|T(A)-1103-04 dated10.11.2003, preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome{axCentral Circle -1, Hyderabad, PAN/GlR No. K-1IDCIT/CC-1 dated 07.03.2003 Between: M/s. Kanumuri Holdings Private Limited, Plot No.30-A Road No.1, Film Nagar,Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad-500033 rep., by its Director K. Raghu Rmakrishna RajuS/o. K.V.S.Suryanarayana Raju, aged ,Oor, ...O#=aaififlt AND Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle l, Aayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTBasheerbagh, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT l.A NO: I OF 2006(ITTAMP. NO: 632 OF 2006) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tostay the recovery of Rs.13,1 1 ,1591 being the balance outstanding demand of taxfor assessment year 2000-0'l and interest from the petitioner till disposal of theappeal by this Hon'ble court. Counsel for the Appellant :SRl. PARTY lN PERSON(Not Present)Counsel for the Respondent :SRl K. MAMATA The Court made the following: ORDER .I'HE IION'BLE SITI,IUSTI(]I' P.SAM KOSHY ANt) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSI'ICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTYITTA No. 568 ol'2006 J U D G M E N T:Qter tlon'ble Siri ./u.trit.c p"SAM KOSHy) When the matter u,as last taken up lo- hcaring. we have adjourned thcmatter and directcd to be taken under the czLption ..lor dismissal,..matter and directcd to be taken under the czLption ..lor dismissal,.. 2. ['foday ]also when thc lnauer is taken up hearing, inspite of repeatedcalls, there is no rcpresentation on behalf clthe appellant. It ts noticed thattherc is no representatio. on bohaI of appt:lant on previous date of hearingr.c.. on I3.09.2023 3 ln vierv of thc saruc. *'c are crnstraint to crisrriss the Appeal fbr r,vant of'prosecution and the i,tcri.r reliclgranted cirrlicr also stands vacated. 4Accordirgly. this Appeal is crisrnissed [br n.n-prosecution. No order asto coststo costs As a sequel, miscellancous applications pending if any, shall stand closed sd/_ K. sRtNtvASA RAOJOrNr REGTFTRAR ti //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tri)unal, Hyderabad Bench [,8,,]Hyderabad1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tri)unal, Hyderabad Bench [,8,,]Hyderabad2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals-|, Hyderabad,3. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome-tax Central Circte _1,Hyderabad3. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome-tax Central Circte _1,Hyderabad 4. One CC to SRl. PARTY tN PERSON, Artvocate [OpUC] 5. One CC to SRl. K MAMATA, Advocate [OpUC] 6. Two CD Copies DL Pntc,, HIGH COURTDATED:19/09/2023 ORDER ITTA.No.568 of 2006 DISMISSED FOR NON.PROSECUTION @t*., =x\ro\>a' .1't-(t'.at:.1 [i'|0\J]L[?3_iI-../\..' ^,.\.. P!','',.',. ,t'.. "7\. -.-._.'--)