Itta/570/2012 Of Commissioner Of Incometax-Vi., Hyderabad v. Pindi Sudhakar Reddy
High Court
18 Dec 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/570/2012 Of Commissioner Of Incometax-Vi., Hyderabad v. Pindi Sudhakar Reddy
Date of order
18 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/570/2012 Of Commissioner Of Incometax-Vi., Hyderabad v. Pindi Sudhakar Reddy, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
I.T.T.A No.570 of 2012
Date: 18.12.2012
Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-VI,Hyderabad
AND
Pindi Sudhakar Reddy,7-2-21, Byramalguda,Saroornagar,Hyderabad
… Appellant
… Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOI.T.T.A. No.570 of 2012
JUDGMENT (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram):
By the judgment of this Court dated 01.10.2010 in I.T.T.A.No.499of 2010, Revenue’s appeal against a common order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench in three appeals wasdismissed insofar as the Revenue’s appeal was preferred against I.T.(S.S) A.No.71/Hyd/2005. The present appeal is preferred against thesame common order insofar it pertains to I.T. (S.S) A.No.70/Hyd/2005.
In the circumstances and for the reasons alike as recorded in thejudgment of this Court dated 01.10.2010, this appeal is also dismissedas all the three appeals in respect of which the common order of theTribunal was passed pertain to block assessment for the period 1986-87 to 1996-97, in respect of the respondent- assessee. No costs.
JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
Date: 18.12.2012
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
va
Date: 18.12.2012
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.