Case LawHigh Court › Itta/57/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Itta/57/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Agricultrual Market Committee

High Court 29 Aug 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/57/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Agricultrual Market Committee
Date of order
29 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itta/57/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Agricultrual Market Committee, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In the aforesaid premise, the appeal is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEGODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN. RAVI SHANKAR ITTA No. 57 of 2011 Dated: 29-8-2011 Between Commissioner of Income Tax,Guntur And Agricultural Market Committee,Chenchupet …Petitioner …Respondent Oral Order:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) It is represented by the learned Senior Counsel for Income-TaxSri S.R. Ashok that in view of the judgment of this Court dated 27-6-2011 in ITTA No. 139 of 2011 this appeal is required to be allowed. By the judgment dated 27-6-2011, this Court has held, followingthe judgment of a Division Bench in ITTA Nos. 421 of 2010 and batchthat the provisions of Section 19(26AAB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(for short ‘the Act’) are prospective in operation. In view of thedecision, the order of the ITAT dated 27-4-2010 in ITA Nos. 563/Viz/2009 dismissing by a common order,the appeals by the Revenue and confirming the order of theCommissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), Guntur holding the provisionsof Clause (26AAB) of Section 10 of the Act to be declaratory andtherefore retrospective, cannot be sustained. In the aforesaid premise, the appeal is allowed. The order dated27-4-2010 of the ITAT in ITA Nos. 562/Viz/2009 and the order dated29-9-2009 of the Commissioner of Income-Tax in ITA No.0013/CIT(A)/GNT/2009-10 are set aside. No costs. ______________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 29[th] August, 2011 GRR ______________________ N. RAVI SHANKAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan