Itta/577/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. M/S. Suman Chit Fund (P) Ltd
High Court
10 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/577/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. M/S. Suman Chit Fund (P) Ltd
Date of order
10 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/577/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. M/S. Suman Chit Fund (P) Ltd, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
.34471
rN rHE [couRr ][FORTEE^S"tI.J= ][oF ]
r Hu [Rs ][DAY' ][r|lF, ]?t'#tIt^YJ-1H.Rtt TWO
PRESENT
THE [P'SAM ]
THE [SRI TUSIilCDT'TNNSING ] rNCOME PEAL[NO: 577][ oF2][012]
Tax [Act,1 ][961]2011 [for ][the]rncomeraxrribunartr-?i:iliit:',1!"i"'"i+"t-tl.?J?",^twllate [Tribunal,]i'"l'j':l#;, ?:',?'rteti-ozd[X";;'riie [o1 ][t'e ][rncome ][rax ][Appe]fuili]u; [b"nch'A, ][HYderabad']
Between:
The Commissioner [of lncome ][Tax ][(TDS)' Hyderabad]
...ApPetlant
AND
M/s. Suman [Chit Funds (P) Ltd ]" [5-4-36/1' J N Road' Abids' Hyderabad']
...ResPondent
Counsel [for ][the ][Appellant: ][Ms ] [SUNITHA (JUNIOR SC FOR INCOME TAX]DEPT)
Counsel for [the ResPondent: ]- - - -
The Court made [the ][following: JUDGMENT]
THE IIONOURABLE S
SSTICE P.SAM KOSHYTHE HONOUROU'" .,TI" *^*s,r#$If [rNG ][RAo]
TTTA No.577 OF 2012
JUDGMENT (per IIon'ble Sri Justice p.Sant Koshy)
Heard Ms. J.Sunitha leamed Junior Standing Counsel fbrthe Income Tax Department for the appellant. perused the record.2. This appeal under Section 260A of the Incorne Tax Act,1961, has been preferred by the Revenue as tlie appellantagainst the order dated 10. l0.20ll passed by the Income.IaxAppellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad, inI.T.A.No.605/Hyd/20II for rhe Assessment year 2007_08.3. Central Board of Direct faxes (CBDI) has issued CircularNo.9 of 2024 dated 17.0g.2024, amending the previous CircularNo.5 of 2024dated, 15.0j.2024, by furrher enhancing the monetarylirnits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department belore theIncorne Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme CourlaS a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of thc said
Circular, [we ][hnd that the monetary ][limit ][f,rxed ][for filing ][an ][appeal]
before [the ][High ][Court ][is ][Rs'2'00 ][crore']
4. In the [instant ][appeal' ][tax ][effect ][is well ][below ][the ][monetary]
1imit.
5. Therefore, [the ][appeal ][filed ][by the ][Depaftment ][is ][dismissed in]terms [of ][the ][aforesaid ][Circular ][No'9 ][of ][2024 ][dated 17'09'2024']However, [if ][the ][appeal comes ][within ][the ][exception ][of ][Circular]No.5 of [2024, ][itwould ][be open ][to ][the lncome ][Tax ][Department ][to]seek revival [of ][the ][aPPeal][ There shall ][be ][no order ][as ][to ][costs']
6. Consequently, [miscellaneous ][petitions pending' ][if ][any' ][shall]
stand closed.
SD/- B. SATYAVATT'!!OINT
//TRUE
SECTI
To
. The lncome The lncome [Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench ]['A" ][Hvderabad'][[ln"o-" ][Tax ][DeOt)' ]][[Tax ][DeOt)' ]][[DeOt)' ]][Advocate
1.. The lncome The lncome 2. One CC [to ][tvls.J.Sunitha' ][i""i"t ][S'" ][*j' ][[ln"o-" ][Tax ][DeOt)' ]][[Tax ][DeOt)' ]][[DeOt)' ]][Advocate 3. ffi A [i" ][sii ][k.n,ii ][Reddv, ][senior ][sc' ][Advocate ][[oPUC]]2. One CC [to ][tvls.J.Sunitha' ][i""i"t ][S'" ][*j' ][[ln"o-" ][Tax ][DeOt)' ]][[Tax ][DeOt)' ]][[DeOt)' ]][Advocate 3. ffi A [i" ][sii ][k.n,ii ][Reddv, ][senior ][sc' ][Advocate ][[oPUC]]
4Two CD [CoPies]
ABK
H]GH COURT
DATED: lOtO4tZOzS
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.577 ot 2012
DISMISSING THE ITTA WITHOUT COSTS
b(1DD10
i\"
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.