Itta/579/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Vibha Agrotech Limited
High Court
02 Aug 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/579/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Vibha Agrotech Limited
Date of order
02 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/579/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Vibha Agrotech Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: BHANU I.T.T.A.Nos.558, 578 and 579 of 2011 COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) These appeals are dismissed as no certified copy of theimpugned order is annexed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANUI.T.T.A.Nos.558, 578 and 579 of 2011
Date: 02-08-2013
I.T.T.A.No.558 of 2011
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-III,I.T. Towers, A.C. Guards,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s. Vibha Agrotech Limited,501, Shuban Sirisampada,Raj Bhavan Road, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.
… Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
I.T.T.A.Nos.558, 578 and 579 of 2011
COMMON ORDER:
(Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
These appeals are dismissed as no certified copy of theimpugned order is annexed. However, liberty is given to prefer theappeals afresh with the certified copy within a period of four weeksfrom date. There will be no order as to costs.
_________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 02-08-2013YCR
_________________
K.C.BHANU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.