Itta/580/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii v. Dr. Usha Mohandas
High Court
28 Feb 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/580/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii v. Dr. Usha Mohandas
Date of order
28 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/580/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax -Iii v. Dr. Usha Mohandas, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The question that arose for consideration was whether there was transferof the immovable property in favour of the developer on 7.9.2001 or on15.9.2004.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURANDHONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
ITTA NO.580 OF 2011
Dt: 28-02-2012.
Between:
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IIIIT TOWERS, A.C.GUARDS,HYDERABAD .. APPELLANT
ANDDR.USHA MOHANDASDOOR NO.6-3-655/2,SOMAJIGUDAHYDERABAD .. RESPONDENT
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURANDHONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.NO.580 OF 2011
JUDGMENT: (PER HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI Madan B.Lokur)
The Revenue is aggrieved by an order dated 12.11.2010 passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench ‘B’, Hyderabad inI.T.A.NO.595/Hyd/2010 relevant for the assessment year 2002-03.
2. The assessee had entered into an agreement of sale of immovableproperty on 7.9.2001. The finding of fact arrived at by the Tribunal is that thevendor and the vendee were in joint possession of the land while it wasbeing developed by the vendee.
3. Full payment of the sale amount as well as exclusive possession of theproperty in question was given by the assessee to the vendee on 15.09.2004by a letter.
4. The question that arose for consideration was whether there was transferof the immovable property in favour of the developer on 7.9.2001 or on15.9.2004.
5. The Tribunal took the view that the transfer was on 15.9.2004 since itwas on that date that the assessee received the full consideration andhanded over exclusive possession of the immovable property to thedeveloper/vendee.
6. In our opinion, on these facts, no substantial question of law arises with
regard to the date of transfer of the capital asset.
7. Accordingly, this I.T.T.A. is dismissed.
8. Miscellaneous application also disposed of.
Dt: 28-02-2012.
( MADAN B.LOKUR, CJ )
( SANJAY KUMAR, J )
TNB
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.