Itta/58/2011 Of Rain Commodities Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Feb 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/58/2011 Of Rain Commodities Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/58/2011 Of Rain Commodities Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 58 OF 2011
Appeal filed under Section 260(A) of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against theorder dated 24-12-2010 passed in lTA.No. 673/Hydl2O1O lor the assessment year20O4-2OO5 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, Bench 'B'Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated O8-12-2OO passed in PAN/GlR No.i </R-269 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-3(1), Hyderabad.
Between:
Rain Commodities Limited,Plot No. 34, Rain Centre, Srinagar Colony,Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 3(1), Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
l.A. NO: 1 OF 20J1(ITTA!4P. NO: 166 OF 2011)
Petitron under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased topass an order granting stay of recovery of disputed taxes for the assessmentyear 2OO4-20O5 during the pendency of the present appeal filed against the orderdaled 24-12-2010 passed by the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad inITA No. 673/Hyd/2010.
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Ch. Pushyam Kiran
Counsel for the Respondents: Sri B. Narasimha Sarma
The Court delivered the following JUDGMENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.58 OF 2011
JUDGMENT'. @er Hon,bte sn Justk.(, [p.s.nr ]KoshLtj
Today, when the marter is taken up for hearing, the learnedcounsel for the appellant submits that the cause in the instant appealhas become infructuous.
2. Recording the above made submission, this appeal standsdismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shallstand closed.
SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAOREGISTRARO [PolNr ]-\ ,l [- ]\ [OFFICER \]
//TRUE COPY//
TO, \ 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, BencY 'B' Hyderabad2. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-3(1), Hyderabad.3. One CC to Sri Ch. Pushyam Kiran, Advocate
4. One CC to Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, Advocate
5. Two CD Copies
VTYDL
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1010212025
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.58 of 2011
DISMISSING THE ITTAAS INFRUCTUOUSAS INFRUCTUOUS
1\aE [STAr]c(2clL)2 [0 ][l\Pn ][2025]c'*tooaat'^5
t(I
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.