Case Law › High Court › Itta/582/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income-...

Itta/582/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii v. Sri Pentakota Annapurna

High Court 04 Apr 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

04 Apr 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/582/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii v. Sri Pentakota Annapurna, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Permission is accorded and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY I.T.T.A.NO.582 OF 2006 JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan} Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw theappeal. Permission is accorded and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending shall stand dismissed. ______________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J) ___________________________________ (M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J) 4[th ]April 2016RRB

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.