Case LawHigh Court › Itta/582/2014 Of M/S.andhra Pradesh Gram...

Itta/582/2014 Of M/S.andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 04 Sep 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/582/2014 Of M/S.andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/582/2014 Of M/S.andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, we dismiss this appeal on that ground with liberty to fileafresh.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A No.582 of 2014 DATE: 04.09.2014 Between:M/s.Andhra Pradesh Grammena Vikas Bank,Warangal.… AppellantAndAsst. Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle – 1, Warangal. … Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No.582 of 2014 ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) Uncertified copy of the judgment and order, against which thisappeal has been preferred, has been filed. Hence, we dismiss this appeal on that ground with liberty to fileafresh. In the event, it is done within four weeks from date with a freshcertified copy unmarked, Registry concerned is directed to scrutinizewhether the certified copy has been annexed to the appeal papers andobserve “fresh one” without having been marked in any matter. Nocosts. _________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan