In Itta/586/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S.hallmark Constructions, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A No.586 of 2014
DATE: 04.09.2014
Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax – II,Hyderabad.… AppellantAndM/s.Hallmark Constructions,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.586 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(per Sri Sanjay Kumar,J)
This appeal by the Revenue seeks to raise the followingsuggested question of law:
“In the facts and circumstances of the case,whether the Hon’ble Tribunal (ITAT) is correct in law inupholding the order of the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals) in deleting the addition made by theAssessing Officer basing on the entries recorded inthe loose sheet found during the survey proceedingsunder Section 133A of the Income Tax Act 1961without appreciating that the Assessing Officer hasbrought enough corroborative evidence on record toprove that the Respondent-assessee has indulged intransactions outside the books of account?”
Perusal of the order under appeal reflects that the issue wasdecided on a fact finding that the document in question was a dumbdocument and no additions could be made on that basis thereof. Weare not inclined to interfere with this fact finding by the lowerauthorities.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
_________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.