Itta/587/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Jagadamba Pearls Dealers
High Court
06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/587/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Jagadamba Pearls Dealers
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/587/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Jagadamba Pearls Dealers, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: AccordirLgiy, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE rwo rHbusAND [FlvE]
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE ANDTHE HON'BLE [JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS ]
INCOM [ APPEAL ][N][O: ][58][7 ][0F ][2013]
lncome tax [Tribunal ][Appeal under ][Section 260-A ][of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act']1961, against [the order ][of the ][lncome ][Tai ][Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad ][Bench]"A" Hyderabad in l.T.A [No ][88 ][/ ][Hyd 12012 ][forAssessmentYear 2005-2006 ][dated]17 -06-2013 [preferred ][against ][the ][order ][of ][the ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax](Appeals) - Vll, [Hyderabad ][dated ][30-12-2011 ][in ][l'T ] [No' ]['t241 ][/ ] [/ ] / [2O1O ][-11 ][preferred against ][the ][order ][of ][the ][Deputy Commissioner ][of](A)-Vll lncome [Tax, ][Central ][Circle ][4, ][Hyderabad ][daled ][31-12-2010 ][in ] [/ ] [No']AAOFSE))3BE
Between:
Commissioner [of lncome Tax-V, ][lT ][Towers' ] [Guards' Hyd']
..APPELLANT
AND
7 -2-7 55, [Pot Market, Secunderabad']M/s. Jagadamba [Pearls ][Dealers,]
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for [the ][Appellant: Ms' B' ] [REDDY' Junior ] [Representing]Snt l.V. PRASAD, [Senior ] [for ] [Department]
Gounsel for the [ResPondents: ][--]The Court delivered [the ][following ][Judgment ][:]
THE HON'BLE THE CIIIEF JUSTICE AIOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.587 of 2Ol3
JUDGMENT:
(Per tLLe llotl,bte the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
Ms. IS.Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standingcounsel representing Mr. J.v.prasad, rearned SeniorStanding Counsei for Income Tax Department Ibr theappellarrt.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of thisCourt to withdraw the appeal in the light of the CircularNo.O9/2024, d,ated. 1.2.O9.2O24, with the liberty to revivethe same in ,:ase the subject matter of the appeal falls inany of the exceptions provided in the Circu lar No.S,/2O24dated 15.03.2024.
3. AccordirLgiy, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the liberty as prayed for.
I(
Miscellaneousapplicationspending'ifany'shall
stand closed. [However, ][there shall ][be ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs']
Sd/.X.SRINIVASA
//TRUE COPY//
SEN OFFICER
To
1. The lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, ].Hyderabad [Bench "A" Hyderabad].Hyderabad [Bench "A" Hyderabad]
2. The Commissioner [of ][lncome Tax (Appeals) ]- [Vll' ][Hyderabad]
3. The Deputy [Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central,Circle ][-4' ][Hyderabad]
4. One CC to [Sri ][J.V. PRASAD, ][Advocate ]
5. Two CD [CoPies]
KuVgha
.t
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/01/202S
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.587 of 2013
DISMISSING TI]E I1'TA ASWIT}IDR-{WNWIT}IDR-{WN
fr[,IW]
'F.1HE[si][ /)]/C(o[\i]1i..(07 iit 7til* Dr-il Spa.rr-' -r
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.