Case LawHigh Court › Itta/589/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/589/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Om International Hotel(P) Ltd

High Court 04 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/589/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Om International Hotel(P) Ltd
Date of order
04 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
1998-99
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/589/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Om International Hotel(P) Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A No.589 of 2014 DATE: 04.09.2014 Between:The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV,Hyderabad.… AppellantAndM/s. Om International Hotel (P) Ltd.,Hyderabad. … Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.589 of 2014 JUDGMENT:(per Sri Sanjay Kumar,J) This appeal by the Revenue seeks to raise the followingsuggested question of law: “Whether in the facts and in the circumstancesof the case the Tribunal is correct in law in holding thatthe income from letting out of the assessee’s buildingto SBI should be assessed as ‘income from business’and not as ‘income from house property’. The order under appeal passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Hyderabad Bench ‘A’ relating to the Assessment Year 1998-99 reflects that the assessee merely put his commercial asset for betteruse during the period of lull in the business. On this fact finding, theTribunal held that the rental income received from such exploitation ofthe commercial asset has to be classified as income from business.The Tribunal drew support from judgments of various High Courts toreach this conclusion. It is not the case of the Revenue that thesejudgments have no application to the facts of this case. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the order passedby the Tribunal. The appeal is devoid of merit and the same is accordinglydismissed. No costs. _________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ Date: 04.09.2014va SANJAY KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan