Case Law › High Court › Itta/590/2016 Of The Director Of Income...

Itta/590/2016 Of The Director Of Income Tax-(Exemptions) v. Congregation Of Cathechist Sisters Of St.anns

High Court 28 Nov 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

28 Nov 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/590/2016 Of The Director Of Income Tax-(Exemptions) v. Congregation Of Cathechist Sisters Of St.anns, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For reasons alike as were mentioned in the order dated 13.07.2016 in I.T.T.A.No.635 of 2015 and in terms thereof, this appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTI CE ANI S I .T.T.A.No.590 of 2016 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar) Sri J.V. Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue, states that the issue raised in this appeal already fell for consideration before this Court in I.T.T.A.No.635 of 2015 and by judgment dated 13.07.2016, this Court held against the Revenue and dismissed the appeal. For reasons alike as were mentioned in the order dated 13.07.2016 in I.T.T.A.No.635 of 2015 and in terms thereof, this appeal is also dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs. _______________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J _____________________ ANI S, J Date:28.11.2016 GJ

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.