Itta/592/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vijaya Sagar Wines
High Court
07 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/592/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vijaya Sagar Wines
Date of order
07 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/592/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Vijaya Sagar Wines, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the above, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _____________________ (Challa Kodanda Ram, J) CVNR, J & CKR, J ITTA.No.592 of 2017 Dt: 07.11.2017
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddyand
The Hon’ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram
ITTA No.592 of 2017Date: 07.11.2017
Between: The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Vijayawada … Appellant andM/s.Vijaya Sagar Wines Ramavaram Kothagudem …Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Mr.J.V.Prasad, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Dept., The Court made the following:
… Appellant
Judgment: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
The issue as to, whether license in the name of one partner could be treated as the license in favour of the “firm as such”, was decided by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’ ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad, in favour of the respondent- assessee.
Mr.J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, submitted that in view of Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, of the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the appellant does not intend to pursue this appeal as its value is below the monetary limits prescribed therein.
In view of the above, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
______________________
(C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)
_____________________
(Challa Kodanda Ram, J)
CVNR, J & CKR, J ITTA.No.592 of 2017 Dt: 07.11.2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.