Case Law › High Court › Itta/594/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/594/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Sri Vinod Krishna Conjeevaram

High Court 10 Dec 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

10 Dec 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/594/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V v. Sri Vinod Krishna Conjeevaram, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: No.588 of 2013 againstthe same impugned judgment, has been dismissed by this Court byorder dt.6.12.2013, this appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.594 OF2013 DATED:10.12.2013 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-VIT Towers, A.C. GuardsHyderabad … Appellant And Sri Vinod Krishna ConjeevaramFlat No.401, 6-1-118 Block, Belvedere GardenPadmarao NagarSecunderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.594 OF 2013 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) Since a connected appeal, being I.T.T.A. No.588 of 2013 againstthe same impugned judgment, has been dismissed by this Court byorder dt.6.12.2013, this appeal is also dismissed. There will be noorder as to costs. ________________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ______________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 10.12.2013 bnr

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.