Case LawHigh Court › Itta/595/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/595/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Ijm (India) Infrastructure Limited

High Court 19 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/595/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Ijm (India) Infrastructure Limited
Date of order
19 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/595/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Ijm (India) Infrastructure Limited, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD IVONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M,S.RAMACHANDRA RAOAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T,VINOD KUMAR INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 595 OF 2014 (lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act 1961,against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A',]Hyderabad in lTA.No.43/11yd12014 for assessment Year 200S -2010 dated29-04-2014 preferred against the Order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax( Transfer Pricing ) Hyderabad, PAN No.AAAC170674 dated 28-01-2013, preferredagainst the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax dated 27-11-2013PAN/GIR No. AAACI 7067 A. Between: Commissioner of lncome Tax-ll, l.T. Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT AND M/S IJM (lndia) lnfrastructure Limited, H.No.1-90/A, Plot No.20&21, RBI Colony,Ivladhapur, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: SMT K. MAMATA CHOUDARY, SC for l.T. Dept. ---Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following: ORDER \ I IO\ O U IIAts E SRI [S'I'ICti ][M.S. RA ] ANI) HONOURABLE SRI [T. ] I.T.T.A. No.s95 0F [2014] JUDGMENT: (Per Sri Justice M.S-Ramachandra [R(to)] Ms. K. Maruata Cl'ro*'darv, [learned Stancling ][Courtsel ][fbr ][lncotne]'I ar [)epartntent has tllecl a letter reqLresting to pcrnlit thc appellant tot ithrlr,lri tltis ,\ppeal ott [the ][qrotttrd ][that the ][re ][spollcicllt ][hacl ][tllccl ][an]under.the [Direcr ][lax ][Vir,ad ][Se ][vishuas ][Schenrc. ][1020 ][rrith],{pplicarion libcr.ty to r.cvir e the [Appcal ][in ][the ][event ][of ][fhilLrre ][o1' ][satistactorl]r'.solulr()n ulrrlcl t]rc sliiLl [Se ][llcttle] 2, lleard the iearned cottnsel [tbl ][the ][Appellant] 3Granting Iiberty as [sought, ][this Appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn] 4Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, ][in this ][Appeal ][shall ][also]stand dismissed. No [cos1s.] SD/.M.SHANTHI JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The lncome Tax [Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ][Bench ][A', ][Hyderabad ]. The lncome Tax lncome Tax Tax .i. fl" AOtitionaiCommissioner [of tncome Tax (Transfer Pricing), ][Hyderabad,] 5. The Oeputy [Commissioner of lncome Tax, Hyderabad'] 4. One CC to-Sri K. lvlamatha [Choudary, Advocate]5. Two CD CoPies6. One Spare [CoPY]Kulsbr \. a DATED: '1910712021 ORDERlTTA.No.595 of 2014 DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTSa(> 16e5IAr6,I(),J04AUB2021a)** DE.si-i
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan