Itta/595/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Ijm (India) Infrastructure Limited
High Court
19 Jul 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/595/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Ijm (India) Infrastructure Limited
Date of order
19 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/595/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Ijm (India) Infrastructure Limited, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
IVONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M,S.RAMACHANDRA RAOAND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T,VINOD KUMAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 595 OF 2014
(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act 1961,against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A',]Hyderabad in lTA.No.43/11yd12014 for assessment Year 200S -2010 dated29-04-2014 preferred against the Order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax( Transfer Pricing ) Hyderabad, PAN No.AAAC170674 dated 28-01-2013, preferredagainst the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax dated 27-11-2013PAN/GIR No. AAACI 7067 A.
Between:
Commissioner of lncome Tax-ll, l.T. Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
M/S IJM (lndia) lnfrastructure Limited, H.No.1-90/A, Plot No.20&21, RBI Colony,Ivladhapur, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SMT K. MAMATA CHOUDARY, SC for l.T. Dept.
---Counsel for the Respondent:
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
I IO\ O U IIAts E SRI [S'I'ICti ][M.S. RA ]
ANI)
HONOURABLE SRI [T. ]
I.T.T.A. No.s95 0F [2014]
JUDGMENT:
(Per Sri Justice M.S-Ramachandra [R(to)]
Ms. K. Maruata Cl'ro*'darv, [learned Stancling ][Courtsel ][fbr ][lncotne]'I ar [)epartntent has tllecl a letter reqLresting to pcrnlit thc appellant tot ithrlr,lri tltis ,\ppeal ott [the ][qrotttrd ][that the ][re ][spollcicllt ][hacl ][tllccl ][an]under.the [Direcr ][lax ][Vir,ad ][Se ][vishuas ][Schenrc. ][1020 ][rrith],{pplicarion libcr.ty to r.cvir e the [Appcal ][in ][the ][event ][of ][fhilLrre ][o1' ][satistactorl]r'.solulr()n ulrrlcl t]rc sliiLl [Se ][llcttle]
2, lleard the iearned cottnsel [tbl ][the ][Appellant]
3Granting Iiberty as [sought, ][this Appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn]
4Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, ][in this ][Appeal ][shall ][also]stand dismissed. No [cos1s.]
SD/.M.SHANTHI JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome Tax [Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ][Bench ][A', ][Hyderabad ].
The lncome Tax lncome Tax Tax .i. fl" AOtitionaiCommissioner [of tncome Tax (Transfer Pricing), ][Hyderabad,]
5. The Oeputy [Commissioner of lncome Tax, Hyderabad']
4. One CC to-Sri K. lvlamatha [Choudary, Advocate]5. Two CD CoPies6. One Spare [CoPY]Kulsbr \.
a
DATED: '1910712021
ORDERlTTA.No.595 of 2014
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT COSTSa(>
16e5IAr6,I(),J04AUB2021a)** DE.si-i
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.