Itta/597/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax [Central] v. Akula Venkata Lakshmi
High Court
05 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/597/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax [Central] v. Akula Venkata Lakshmi
Date of order
05 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/597/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax [Central] v. Akula Venkata Lakshmi, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
* I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
* HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND
HON’BLE SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
+ I .T.T.A.No.597 of 2017
% Date: 05-09-2017
Betw een:
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Hyderabad.
And
Adkula Venkata Lakshmi, W/o. Akula Venkateswara Rao, Door No.10-2-18, Vontedduvariveedhi, Amalapuram, East Godavari District.
… Petitioner
… Respondent
! Counsel for the Petitioner ^ Counsel for the Respondents
: Mr. J.V. Prasad
: Mr.
< GI ST:
> HEAD NOTE:
? Cases referred
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN And HON’BLE SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
JUDGMENT: (Per VRS,J)
I .T.T.A.No.597 of 2017
The tax effect of the appeal is below the ceiling limit prescribed under Circular No.21/2015, dated 10.12.2015, and the case does not fall under any of the exceptions prescribed under para-8. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
2. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Js.
5[th] September, 2017.
_______________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN, J. ____________ T. RAJANI , J.
Js.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND HON’BLE SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI
I .T.T.A.No.597 of 2017
(Per VRS,J)
5[th] September, 2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue