Itta/599/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1 v. M/S. New River Software System Pvt Ltd
High Court
30 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/599/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1 v. M/S. New River Software System Pvt Ltd
Date of order
30 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/599/2015 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1 v. M/S. New River Software System Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
I.T.T.A.NO.599 OF 2015
JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
Sri J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax,would submit that, as the respondent-assessee merged with a companyin Hyderabad, the matter was transferred from the Commissionerate atDelhi to the Commissionerate at Hyderabad for preferring an appeal;and, while the impugned order is an order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, by oversight an appeal has beenpreferred before this Court. Learned Senior Standing Counsel, wouldsubmit that, as this Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain thisappeal, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the appeal to enable themto approach the Delhi High Court.
Permission is accorded.
The ITTA is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order asto costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
Registry to return the certified copy of the order passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi to the learned Senior StandingCounsel for Income Tax under due acknowledgment.
______________________________
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
___________________________________
(M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J)
30[th] June 2016RRBRRB
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.