Itta/60/2024 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S.nsl Nagapatnam Power Ventures Private Limited
High Court
24 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/60/2024 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S.nsl Nagapatnam Power Ventures Private Limited
Date of order
24 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2016-11
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/60/2024 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 v. M/S.nsl Nagapatnam Power Ventures Private Limited, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed as rruiLhdran'n, rrvithliberty prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No: 60 of 2024
Income tax Tribunar Appear under section 260-A of the rncome rax Act, 1961,against the order of the Income Tax Appelate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,8,,Hyderabad in lrA No.1242lHydtzo19 for Assessment year 2016-11 dated 18_06_2021 preferred against the order of the commissioner of rncome Tax (Appears)-4,Hyderabad daled 24-05-2019 in Appeat No t0205/2018_1g/tTO.Wd_16(2yCIT(A)_4lHydl19-20, preferred against the order of the office of the lncome Tax officer,Ward 16(2), Hyderabad dated i 9-t 1-201 I pAN No./GtR No: AADCp9603L.Between:
The Pr. Commissioner of lncome-tax-4, Hyderabad.
...Appellant
AND
M/s.NQL Nagapatnam power Ventures private Limited, No. 8_26g4-2_4, NSL|-"91,^ESC9 No. ['12, ]Banjara Hi[s, Hyderabad _ 50b Oa+, refangina.'pAN_*AADCP9603L.|-"91,^ESC9 No. ['12, ]Banjara Hi[s, Hyderabad _ 50b Oa+, refangina.'pAN_*AADCP9603L.
... Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant: SRt J.V. PRASAD, SC FOR lT DEPARTMENT
Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI A.V. RAGHU RAM
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESTIWAR RAOr.T.T.A.NO.60 0F 2024
JUDGMENT (per Hon'ble SP,J)
Sri J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Stalding Counsel frrr IncomeTa-x Department, for the appellant and Sri A.V.Raghu Rarr., learnedcounsel for Lhe respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the appellalt submits that tl)e appealappears to be below the monetary limit as per thc Circular- No.O9 of2024, dated 17.O9.2024, issued by the Central Board of Dirt:ct Ta_xes.However, he may be given liberty to revive this appeal, if, it falts urthinthe exception clauses of Circular No.5 of 2024, dared 15.03.202.1.
3. The other side has no objection.
4. Accordingly, this Appeal is dismissed as rruiLhdran'n, rrvithliberty prayed for. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pellding, il any, shall
stand closed.
SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAOJOTNTIREGTSTRAR\. ).t-_-_:
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B', ]Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-4, Hyderabad
3. The lncome Tax Officer, Ward 16(2), Hyderabad
Il4 One CC to SRI J.V. PRASAD, SC FOR lT DEPARTIVENT 5. One CC to SRI A.V. RAGHU RAM, Advocate 6. Two CD Copieskam5. One CC to SRI A.V. RAGHU RAM, Advocate 6. Two CD Copieskam
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410912024
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.60 of 2024
THIS APPEAL ISDISMISSED ASWITHDRAWN
2r\t'
cidpe(..\ ,, a_. .rri-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.