Itta/605/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii v. M/S Talwar Mobiles Private Limited
High Court
10 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/605/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii v. M/S Talwar Mobiles Private Limited
Date of order
10 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/605/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii v. M/S Talwar Mobiles Private Limited, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.605 OF 2014
DATED: 10.09.2014
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-II
… Appellant
and
M/s.Talwar Mobiles Private Limited
… Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.No.605of2014
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
The Tribunal has followed the decision of the SpecialBench of the Tribunal in the case of Bhaumik Colour P. Ltd(313 ITR (AT) 43) wherein it has been held that in order toinvoke the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-taxAct, 1961, assessee-company itself must be a shareholderin the other company, and mere existence of commonshareholders would not justify the invoking of the provisionsof the said Section. We are of the view that the decision ofthe Tribunal is absolutely correct. We do not find infirmitytherein.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed.
10[th] SEPTEMBER, 2014.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
__________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
kvni
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.