Itta/608/2013 Of The Commissionr Of Income Tax-Iv v. Sri P Srinivas Reddy
High Court
19 Dec 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/608/2013 Of The Commissionr Of Income Tax-Iv v. Sri P Srinivas Reddy
Date of order
19 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/608/2013 Of The Commissionr Of Income Tax-Iv v. Sri P Srinivas Reddy, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, we dismiss theappeal on that ground alone, however, with a liberty toprefer appeal with a fresh certified copy.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THRUSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OFDECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No.608 OF 2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad.
..... Appellant
AND
Sri P.Srinivas Reddy
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
In the certified copy of the order, relevant portion hasbeen underlined. We do not accept this certified copy ofthe order which is underlined. We are sure that this has
not been done by the Court. Accordingly, we dismiss theappeal on that ground alone, however, with a liberty toprefer appeal with a fresh certified copy. This shall bedone within a period of four weeks from date, in default theissue will close the chapter.
______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
December 19, 2013MAS
______________
Sanjay Kumar, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue