Case LawHigh Court › Itta/612/2013 Of Director Of Income Tax...

Itta/612/2013 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. M/S Nisso Iwai Corporation Japan

High Court 04 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/612/2013 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. M/S Nisso Iwai Corporation Japan
Date of order
04 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/612/2013 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. M/S Nisso Iwai Corporation Japan, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed. __________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No.612 of 2013 DATED:4.2.2014 Between:The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation),Bengaluru. … Appellant And Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(2),Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No.612 of 2013 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This appeal is sought to be preferred against the judgmentand order of the learned Tribunal dated 22.6.2010 and issought to be admitted on the following substantial questions oflaw: 1.In the facts and circumstances of the case, whether thefinding of the Hon’ble Tribunal that the amounts receivedby the respondent asssessee for supply of design andengineering drawings do not come within the definition of‘fee for technical services’ in terms of Section 9(1)(vii) ofIncome Tax Act is not erroneous and contrary to law andliable to be set aside ? 2.Whether the finding of the Hon’ble Tribunal that the feefor design and engineering drawings received by theRespondent assessee is not liable for tax in India, is notvitiated in law as the Hon’ble Tribunal failed to considerand appreciate the material facts and reasons on record ? We have heard Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counselfor the appellant and have gone through the judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal. It appears, the learned Tribunal, on fact, found that there has been no accrual of income in India and this accrual ofincome has taken place in Japan. As such, the Income Tax Actcannot be made applicable. We feel that the decision is legallycorrect and we do not find any element of law to be decided inthis appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 4.2.2014 PNB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan