Itta/614/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Maytas Ncc Jv
High Court
27 Dec 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/614/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Maytas Ncc Jv
Date of order
27 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/614/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Maytas Ncc Jv, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OFDECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No.614 OF 2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-III,IT Towers, A.C. Guards,Hyderabad,
..... Appellant
AND
Maytas NCC JV,41, NCC House,Nagarjuna Hills,Punjagutta, Hyderabad
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
We have heard Mr. B.Narasimha Sarma, learnedcounsel for the appellant and gone through theimpugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal.
It appears that the learned Tribunal has notdecided anything on merit or recorded any findingexcept remanding the matter for fresh hearing.
Accordingly we do not find any element of law tobe decided in this appeal. The appeal is accordinglydismissed. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in thisappeal shall stand closed.
______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
December 27, 2013MAS
______________
Sanjay Kumar, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.