Case LawHigh Court › Itta/618/2013 Of The Director Of Income...

Itta/618/2013 Of The Director Of Income Tax-Tax(Exemptions) v. M/S. Ghulam Ahmed Health Trust

High Court 13 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/618/2013 Of The Director Of Income Tax-Tax(Exemptions) v. M/S. Ghulam Ahmed Health Trust
Date of order
13 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/618/2013 Of The Director Of Income Tax-Tax(Exemptions) v. M/S. Ghulam Ahmed Health Trust, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.618 of 2013 Date: 13-02-2014 Between: The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions),Hyderabad .....Appellant AND M/s Ghulam Ahmed Health Trust,Hyderabad. ...Respondent HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.618 of 2013 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant andgone through the judgment and order of the learned Tribunal dated18[th] February, 2013. It appears that the learned Tribunal, upon scrutinizing theobjects clause of the assessee trust, has found that the charitableactivity is provided. The learned Tribunal has again found that theregistration granted in favour of the assessee has not beencancelled and hence the assessee is continuing to enjoy thestatus as a registered body. Moreover, mere registration does notautomatically entail exemption and this exemption will be grantedonly after establishing the fact that the income has been utilizedfor charitable activity, not otherwise. We, therefore, do not findany reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the learnedTribunal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ __________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan