Itta/618/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vijayawada v. M/S. Srinivasa Engineering Construction Company , Vijayawada
High Court
15 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/618/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vijayawada v. M/S. Srinivasa Engineering Construction Company , Vijayawada
Date of order
15 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/618/2017 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vijayawada v. M/S. Srinivasa Engineering Construction Company , Vijayawada, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENTHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARANDHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.618 of 2017
Appeal under Section 260 A of Income Tax Act, aggrieved[by][ the]order dated 25.11.2016 in I.T.A.No.487/Hyd/2013 (Assessment year 2006-07) before the Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,[Visakhapatnam]Bench,atVisakhapatnamandpreferredagainsttheorderoftheCommissionerof Income Tax (Appeal), Vijayawada, dated16.04.2013bearingAppealNo.263/CIT(A)A/JA/2011-12andpreferredagainsttheorderoftheIncome-TaxOfficer,Ward-1 (2),VijayawadainPAN/GIR.NO.ABBFS5740B/A.Y.2006-07/ITO/Vijayawada,dated29.08.2011.
Between:
The Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Vijayawada.
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s. Srinivasa Engineering Construction Company, C/o.[Partner:][ Sri]Potiuri Prasanth, D.No. 40-4-5A, JVR Street, Tikkil Road, Vijayawada-5520010....RESPONDENT
Counselfor the Appellant: SRI J V PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)Counsel for the Respondent: SRI Y RATNAKARThe Court made the following JUDGMENT:
To
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDARAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 618 of 2017
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
1.The learned counsel for the Appellant-Department has[filed]a memo into Court, including a copy of the circular whereby, theAppellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy[and][ under]the said policy, it has been resolved not to initiate any Appeals orPetitions, wherethe monetary stakesinvolvedarelessthanRs.2 Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court[to][ withdraw]the Appeal.a memo into Court, including a copy of the circular whereby, theAppellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy[and][ under]the said policy, it has been resolved not to initiate any Appeals orPetitions, wherethe monetary stakesinvolvedarelessthanRs.2 Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court[to][ withdraw]the Appeal.
2.Submission is placed on record.
3.Accordingly,the Appealis dismissed as withdrawn.Nocosts.costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions,if any.
pending in this Appeal shall stand closed.
SD/- E.KAMESWARA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, at
1. The Income Tax AppellateVisakhapatnam.Visakhapatnam.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Vijayawada,[Krishna]District.District.
3. The Income-Tax Officer, Ward-1 (2), Vijayawada,[Krishna][ District.]
4. One CC to Sri J V Prasad (SC for Income Tax), Advocate[ ]
5. One CC to Sri Y Ratnakar, Advocate
6. Three CD Copies
TK
TAC
•3■**
:i!3iili
I'l
HIGH COURT
DATED;15/11/2024
JUDGMENT
lTTA.No.618 of 2017
i.s=1 9 MAt m\\h^. Curreni Section
DISMISSING THE ITTA AS WITHDRAWN
%\
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.