Itta/619/2017 Of The Prl Commr Of Income Tax-6, Hyderabad v. M/S Rukmini Devi Trust, Hyderabad
High Court
06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/619/2017 Of The Prl Commr Of Income Tax-6, Hyderabad v. M/S Rukmini Devi Trust, Hyderabad
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/619/2017 Of The Prl Commr Of Income Tax-6, Hyderabad v. M/S Rukmini Devi Trust, Hyderabad, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the liberty as prayed for. t Miscellaneous applications [pending, ][if ][any, ][shall] stand closed. [However, there ][shall ][be ][no order as to costs'] Sd/- K.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL [No: 619 ][ot2017]
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal [Under Section ][260 ] [of ][the ][lncome Tax Act]1961 against the order dated [21-12-2O16 ][on the file ][of ][the ][lncome Tax Appellate]Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A', ][Hyderabad ][in ][l.T'A-No.643lHydl2015 ][for]Assessment Year 2011-2012 [preferred against the ][order ][dated ][17-03-2015 ][on ][the]file of the Commissioner of [lncome Tax ][(Appeals)-Vl, Hyderabad ][in ] [A No']01384/DCIT 6(1) iCIT(A)-Vlt2O14'15 [preferred against ][the ][Order ][dated ][2743-]2014 passed in PAN / GIR [No.AABTRT8'19K ][on ][the ][file ][of ][the ][Deputy]Commissioner of lncome-Tax, [Circle ]- [6 ][(1), Hyderabad.]Between:
The Pr. Commissioner of lncome-tax-6, [Hyderabad.]
...AppellanUAPPellant
AND
M/s Rukmini Devi Trust, 8-2-293t82tN549lB' [Jubilee ][Hills ][Co-op ][Housing]Society, Road no.27, Jubilee [Hills, Hyderabad ][- ][500 ][032.]
...RespondenUResPondent
Counsel for the Appellant: [Ms. ][B. Sapna Reddy, ][Standing ][Counsel]representing fUr.,lt.V. [Prasad, ][Standing ][Counsel ][for ][lncome Tax Department]
Counsel for the Respondent: [Sri ][G.V.N. Hari]The Court delivered the [following: ]
THE HON'BLE THE CIIIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEAND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SR.EENTVAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.619 of 2ot7
JUDGMENT: per Lhe Hon,bte the Chief Justice Atok Aradhel
Ms. IS.Sapna Reddy, learned Junior StandingCounsel representing Mr. J.V.prasad, learned SeniorStanding Counsel for Income Tax Department for theappellant.
2. Learneri counsel for the appellant seeks leave oi thisCourt to withdraw the appeal in the light of the CircularNo.O9/202a, dated 17.09.2024, with the liberty to revivethe same in case the subject matter of the appeal jalls inany of the e>:ceptions provided in the Circu lar No.S/2024dated 15.O3.2'024.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the liberty as prayed for.
t
Miscellaneous applications [pending, ][if ][any, ][shall]
stand closed. [However, there ][shall ][be ][no order as to costs']
Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\
To,
STION OFFICER
1. The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench ]['A', ][Hyderabad']
2. The Commissioner of [lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vl, Hyderabad']
3. The Deputy Commissioner [of lncome-Tax, ][Circle ]- [6 (1), Hyderabad']
4. One CC to Mr. J.V. Prasad, [Standing Counsel ][for ][lncome ][Tax ][Department]loPUClloPUCl
5. One CC to Sri G.V.N. [Hari, ][Advocate ]
6. Two CD CoPies
ka1/eh_vx*
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610112025
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.619 of 2017
THE APPEAL ISDISMISSED ASWITHDRAWN
i.rldUL
=:.\.\{9 [S'IAl](.vo31 [jll]2'n5a^-'tt),,, [-;'':"]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.