Case LawHigh Court › Itta/6/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Itta/6/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Supreme Recording Co. Pvt. Ltd

High Court 19 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/6/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Supreme Recording Co. Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
19 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/6/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Supreme Recording Co. Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Therefore, this appeal is also dismissed. ___________________ K.J.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A.No.6 of 2013 DATED: 19.7.2013 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Hyderabad. … Appellant And M/s. Supreme Recording Company Pvt. Ltd.,Hyderabad. …. Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A.No.6 OF 2013 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We have heard Sri. J.V. Prasad, learned counsel for theappellant and gone through the impugned judgment andorder of the learned Tribunal. We are of the view that this order does not call for anyinterference for two reasons, firstly, the learned Tribunal hasfollowed its earlier decision in assessee’s own case, whichwas not challenged before any forum and secondly, onidentical facts and on similar issue, this Court dismissedanother appeal. Therefore, this appeal is also dismissed. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ G. ROHINI, J 19.7.2013 pnb
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan