Itta/622/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo Pvt Ltd., Shamshabad

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERA.BAD MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 622 OF 2017 Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against theorder dated 31-O3-2O17 in l.T.A.No. 1094 / HYD/ 20'16 on the fite of the Court ofthe lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal , Hyderabad "A" Bench, Hyderabad preferredagainst the order dated 31-03-2016 in lT A No. 444 / ITO , Ward -2 (3) I 2015 -16order dated 31-O3-2O17 in l.T.A.No. 1094 / HYD/ 20'16 on the fite of the Court ofthe lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal , Hyderabad "A" Bench, Hyderabad preferredagainst the order dated 31-03-2016 in lT A No. 444 / ITO , Ward -2 (3) I 2015 -16on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals )-9 Hyderabadpreferred against the order daled 27-02-2015 in PAN / GIR No. AACCC9611Non the file of the lncome Tax Officer, \Nard -2 (3) , Hyderabad.on the file of the lncome Tax Officer, \Nard -2 (3) , Hyderabad. Between: Pr. Commissioner Of lncome Tax -2 , Hyderabad ...APPELLANT/ Respondent AND M/s. Hyderabad lt4enzies Air Cargo Private Limited , Air Cargo Terminal, RajivGandhi lnternational Airport, Shamshabad-500049. ...RESPONDENT/ AppellantSenior SC for lTSC for lTfor lTlT/ Department Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K MAMATA CHOUDARY Senior SC for lTSC for lTfor lTlT Counsel forthe Respondent: NONE APPEAREDThe Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDTHE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA ITTA No.622 of 2OL7 JUDGiMENT:(Per the HotL'bLe the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhugan) Heard Ms. K.Mamta Choudary, learned [Senior]Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department [appearing]lor ttLe appellant. 2. This appeal has been {iled against the order dated31.03.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Hyderabad A' Bench, Hyderabad in I.T.A.No. iO94/Llydl2016 for the assessment year 2012-13. 3" The appeal was admitted for hearing on 07 .11.2017 [.] 4. Today learned counsel for the appellant submits thaton an application filed by the respondent under the [Direct]Tax [r/ivad ]Se Vishwas Scheme, 2O2O, the matter has beensettk:d between the parties following vrhich full and finalsettiement dues have been paid by the respondent.Ther:fore, appellant would like to withdrarv the appeal. 5. In view cf the above. t]1is appeai is dismisseci oriu'i ih d raq,al 6. Miscellaleousapplications pending, if any, shalistand closed. However, there sball be no order as to costs" // rRUE copy // 5D/-K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARCaDSECTION OFFICER TO {#;q5,g;;'+li:*:H,lrtr,t-ffi [I;,J;,,] +" IHIGH COJRTDATED: 1L/O7/2022,1ORDERITTA.No ,622o1 2Ol722 [sEP 2SIl]DISMISSING THE AS WITHDRAWN/-Un)aARI