Itta/63/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S. Virchow Laboratories Limited
High Court
09 Aug 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/63/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S. Virchow Laboratories Limited
Date of order
09 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/63/2008 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S. Virchow Laboratories Limited, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL [No: ][63 ] [2008]
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section [260A ][of the ][lncome Tax ][Act,]1961 arising out of the order of the lncome [Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal, ][Hyderabad]Bench ['B', ]Hyderabad in ITA No.477lHyd12002, [Assessment ][Year: ][1998-99, ][dated]14-08-2003 [preferred ]against the [Order ]of [the ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][,](Appeals)-lV, Hyderabad, Appeal No.330/JCSR-5iClT(A)lViO1-02,dated:14-03-2022 [preferred ]against the Order [of ][the ][Additional ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax,](Assessments) Special Range-S, Hyderabad, PAN [No. , ] [No.V-24]dated 28-1 1-2000.
Between:
Commissioner of lncome Tax-lll, [Hyderabad]
AND
M/s. Virchow Laboratories Ltd., Jeedimetla, [Hyderabad.]
Counsel for the Appellant: B. NARASIMHA
Counsel for the Respondent: [A.V. KRISHNA KOUNDINYA]
The Court delivered the following:
...APPELLANT
...RESPONDENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSttY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTYI.T.T.A. No.63 of 2OO8I.T.T.A. No.63 of 2OO8
JUDGMENT:ap e.r Ho,t'ble Si Justice P.SAM KOSHli,)
Heard Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for theappellant and Sri A.V. Krishna Koundinya, learned counsel forthe respondent.
This appeal under Section appeal under Section under Section Section 260A of the Income Tax of the Income Tax Income Tax Acr,
2This appeal under Section appeal under Section under Section Section 260A of the Income Tax of the Income Tax Income Tax Acr,196 1, has been preferred by the Revenue as the appellantagainst the order dt. 14.08.2003 passed by the lncome TaxAppellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,8,, Hyderabad,1nlTA.No.477 /Hyd/2OO2 for the assessment year 199g_1999.3. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issuecl CircularNo.17 of 2019 dt.O8.OB.2olg, amending the previous Circular3. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issuecl CircularNo.17 of 2019 dt.O8.OB.2olg, amending the previous CircularNo.3 of 2018 dt. lI.O7.2OlB, by further enhancing the moneta-rylimits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before thelimits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and SupremeCourt as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of theCourt as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of thesaid Circular, .,r,e find that the monetary limit fixed for filing anappeal before the High Court is Rs. 1.00 crore.appeal before the High Court is Rs. 1.00 crore.
4. In the instant appeal [tax ][effect ][is well ][below ][the ][monetary]limit.
5. Therefore, the [appeal ][filed by the Department ][is ][dismissed]in terms of the [a-foresaid ][Circular ][No'17 ][of ][20 ][19 ][dt'08 ][08'2019']if the [appeal ][comes ][within the ][exception ][under]However, paragraph 10 of [Circular ][No.3 ][of ][20 ][18, ][it ][would be ][open ][to ][the]Income Tax [Department ][to ][seek ][revival ][of the ][appeal' ][No ][order]as to costs.
6. Consequently, [miscellaneous ][petitions pending' ][if ][any']sha-1l stand [closed]Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPYIIqbSECTION OFFICER
To,1The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad.]The Commissioner of lncome [Tax ], [(Appeals)-lV, ][Hyderabad.]1The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad.]The Commissioner of lncome [Tax ], [(Appeals)-lV, ][Hyderabad.]
, 3The Additional Commissioner [of lncome Tax, (Assessments) Special ][Range-]5, Hyderabad.5, Hyderabad.4One CC to SRI B. NARASIMHA [SARMA, ][Advocate ]
qOne CC to SRI A.V. KRISHNA [KOUNDINYA, ][Advocate ] fiTwo CD CopiesfiTwo CD CopieskamPrnq.Prnq.
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910812023
6. Consequently, [miscellaneous ][petitions pending' ][if ][any']sha-1l stand [closed]Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPYIIqbSECTION OFFICER
To,1The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad.]The Commissioner of lncome [Tax ], [(Appeals)-lV, ][Hyderabad.]1The lncome Tax Appellate [Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad.]The Commissioner of lncome [Tax ], [(Appeals)-lV, ][Hyderabad.]
, 3The Additional Commissioner [of lncome Tax, (Assessments) Special ][Range-]5, Hyderabad.5, Hyderabad.4One CC to SRI B. NARASIMHA [SARMA, ][Advocate ]
qOne CC to SRI A.V. KRISHNA [KOUNDINYA, ][Advocate ] fiTwo CD CopiesfiTwo CD CopieskamPrnq.Prnq.
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910812023
JUDGMENTITTA.No.63 of 2008
ITTA IS DISMISSED
C1:-+\e\r-e'
ti)s-+o=si:";\.-<:.4.: -.il.r'-.:/-'.,'.J'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.