Case LawHigh Court › Itta/63/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Itta/63/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Demi Realtors

High Court 21 Jun 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/63/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Demi Realtors
Date of order
21 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/63/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Demi Realtors, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI I.T.T.A. No.63 OF 2013 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-IIHyderabad ..... Appellant AND Demi Realtors,8-3-167/133/301, Flat No. 302,Laxmi Nilayan Apartmetns, Plot No. 132,Rajeev Nagar, Hyderabad. .....Respondent The Court made the following : JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta) Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and having gone through the impugned judgment and order ofthe Appellate Tribunal, we find that the appeal is disposedof absolutely on facts and no law point is involved.Moreover, the Appellate Tribunal has taken the decisionon the concessions made by the learned representative ofthe Department. Hence, we do not find any ground tointerfere with the order impugned. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as tocosts. _______________________ Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ. June 21, 2013MAS __________ G.Rohini, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan