Case LawHigh Court › Itta/63/2022 Of Principal Commissioner O...

Itta/63/2022 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Sri Ch.govardhan Naidu

High Court 07 Mar 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/63/2022 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Sri Ch.govardhan Naidu
Date of order
07 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/63/2022 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) v. Sri Ch.govardhan Naidu, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The present appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWOTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMAANOTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 63 OF 2022 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad in ITANo.2007 to 2011lHydl2O18 for assessment year 2007 -08 to 2010-11 daled 0810612021preferred against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax, Appeals -ll, HyderabadAppeal No.474l2016-'17/DCIT daled 1310712018, [preferred ]against the Order of theDy.Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle -l (2), Hyderabad PAN/GlRNo.ADDPC6489 M daled 27 10812015 Between:Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax (Central), 7thFloor, Aayakar Bhavan,Basheerbagh, Hyderabad - 500 004.ANDSri Ch.Govardhan Naidu, D.No. 3-942, YMR Colony, Proddutur, Kadapa District,Andhra Pradesh. Floor, Aayakar Bhavan,...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI B.NARASIMHA SARMA, AdvocateFor the Respondent : NONE APPEAREDThe Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE THE CHIET JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SIIARMAANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR, SHAVILI I.T.T.A.No.63 of 2Q22 JUDGMENT: lPer the Hon'bLe the Chie,f Justice Satish Chcu'Ldrc; Sharma) Learned counsel for the Income Tax Department isfair enough in informing this Court that similar appeal i.e",ITTA No.60 of 2022 involving the same assessee for theassessment year 2OlO-20 1 t has already been dismissed bya Division Bench of this Court on 03.O3.2022. The Division Bench of this Court has considered thesubstantial questions of law involved in the llresent appealalso in ITTA No.60 of 2022 and therefore, no further ordersare required to be passed in the present appeal. The judgment delivered in ITTA No.60 of 2022, daled03,03.2022, sha11 be applicable mutatis mutandis in thepresent case also. The present appeal is accordingly dismissed. Let acopy of the judgment passed by the Divisior-r Bench of thisCourt in ITTA No.60 of 2022, dated 03.03.2r)22, be kept oncopy of the judgment passed by the Divisior-r Bench of thisCourt in ITTA No.60 of 2022, dated 03.03.2r)22, be kept onrecord in the present case. Themisceilaneousappiicationspending,ifany,shallstand [closed.][ There shali ][be ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs'] sd/-K?sxyasr$rmL\-/SECTION //TRUEooPY// To1.The Judicial [Member' ][lncome Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad Bench 'A']?.Bll"i3?i [.,, ][B.Narasimha ][sharma ][Advocate (oPU C)] [[CoPies]]VV 3.Two [[CoPies]]4.One SPare Kj One SPare [CoPY] \ HIGH COURTDATEDt07l0312022 '{ ytE sT4;'AJUDGMENTlfiA.No.63 of 2022cv'1 ['l ]iult :"';ra)C),1,- [.::.-] DISMISSING THE ITTA.-J))'%[b]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan