Itta/632/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Adp Pvt.ltd
High Court
13 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/632/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Adp Pvt.ltd
Date of order
13 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itta/632/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Adp Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 632 OF 2016
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 206-A of the lncome Tax Act,'1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellant Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B',Hyderabad in lTA.No.171 1/Hydl2011 for Assessment Year 2007-08 dated23.12.2015 preferred against the Order of the Additional Commissioner of lncomeTax (Transfer Pricing) Hyderabad PAN No. dated 31.08.2010preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-1 (1),Hyderabad PAN No. dated 25.08.2011.
Between:
The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax-|, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s. ADP P!,1. Ltd.,6-3-1091/C/1 , Fortune9, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad-500 082.
...RESPONDENT
counsel for the Appell"rfr snt B. NARASIMHA SARMA, SC FOR l.T. DEPT.
Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEAREDThe Court made the following: ORDER
THE: ]ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAl'IANDTHE H( N'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NI\\IDA
|TTA.NO.632 0F 2016
(. R D E R (per the Hon'ule SriJustice Uiial Blgfqll
Heard ltrlr. B \arasimha Sarma learned Standlng Cr>rrr sel for lncomeTax Department for he appellant.
None appear ;for the respondent.
lvlr. B.Narasi nha Sarma, learned Standing Counsr:l submits on thebasis of writlen ins ructions dated 07.06.2022 that the al)l)eal filed by theRevenue is requirer to be withdrawn as the issue is covered under'Vivad SeVishwas' scheme.
That being th r position, the related appeal is disrnisstxl on withdrawal.
Interlocutory \pplications pending, if any, shall stanrl closed. No orderas to costs.as to costs.
SD,+"?s+wt?$[iRt/LUlZ\i\>-SiECTION
//rRuE coPY//
To,1.The [Chairman, ][lr ][come ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal ][Hyderaba,J ][[]ench ][.B',]Hvderabad.2.J.4.TilETx$'J,",:s['fi$.iHff onL cc to [Sri ] [Narastmr]tinTrcllq.$''flTli[[ii"3]n**"*'"'(iwo CD [CoPies]bOne [SPare ][CoP]s[br] \-y
HIGH COURT
DATED: 13/06 2022
ORDER
ITTA.No.632 c f 2016
DISMISSING [''HE ]ITTAAS WITHDRA WNoV>
.-'=:a-//1\[, ][a ][s ][iAIe:]o.(.,<.d\ttB-\,J[ 9 ti0! [2u]or.9.\DESP+
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.