Itta/636/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S Nmdc Limited

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD MONDAY. THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI |.T.T.A. NO: 636 OF 2016 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B' Hyderabad in ITAthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B' Hyderabad in ITANo.1793/Hyd/2013 for assessment year 2010-11 dated 0910512014 preferred againstthe Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-V, Hyderabad in ITANo.000B/JC-16/C|T(A)-V/2013-14 dated 1610912013 preferred against the Order of theAdditional Commissioner of lncome Tax, Range-l6, Hyderabad in pANNo.AAACN7325A, dated 121031201 3No.AAACN7325A, dated 121031201 3 Between: The Commissioner of lncome Tax-lV, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT AND M/s NN4DC Limited, Khanij Bhavan, 10-3-31 1/A, Castle Hills, Masab Tank, Hyderabad ,.,RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI J.V.PRASAD, Sr. SC for lncome Tax DepartmentFor the Respondent : SRI P.KARTHIK RAMANA, Advocate rep. forSRI S.DWARAKANATH, Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT To HONOI- RABLE [Sltl ] [UJ'JAL ][llHtlYr\N]ANI)TIONOUII \I}LE [SM'T. JTJSTICE ][P. ][MAI)ITAVI I)EVI] l.'l-.T.A.No.6 3(r [2016] .lL DCMENT: [rl ][r ][l'lttn ][hl, ][St ][i ltt\tt'( ] [11tl ][bltt't'tttt] I.leardMr.]V'Prasatl.learnctlstandirigCounsellirrthcallpeliant-lrrcontc ['[ ]ax [[)el ][artlncllt and ][Mr'P ][Karthik ][ltarnana' ][leartrcd ][counsel]Mr.l .Dwarakallath. [Icarned ][counsel ][Itrr ][the ][resllondeut-]represcll [t ][lll9]AS SC SSC [C] 2. 'fhis apper I by the revenue under Section 260,4 [of ][the ][lncome]Tax Act, [1961 ][is ][directed ][against ][the ][order ][of ][the ][Income ][Tax]Appellate [Tribur ][al in ] [No'1793/[Iyd/2013 ][dated ][09'05'2014 for]the assessment Y [:ar ][20 ] [0- ] ['] 3. It is [subn ][itted the ][respondent-assessee ][has settled ][the ][matter]under the Vivad [Se ][Vishwas ][Schemc ][which ][has ][bcen ][appt'oved ][by ][the]lncotne 1'ax [DcP ][tlltnent.] 4. [n that [vi ]:w [ol- ][thc ][matter, appcllant ][sccks ][to ][u ][ithdrau' ][the] appeal. 5. Appeal is [accordingly' ][disposcd ][olon ][withclrawal'] 6. Miscellan:ous [applications, ][ilany ][pending' ][shall ][stand closed'] 1 . No costs. Sd,,-K.SRINIVASA .]OINT REGISTRAR /TTRUE SEC"ION 1. The The [lncome Tax ][/ ][ppellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderabad.Bench ]['B' ][Hvderabad][[[Hyderabad']]] 1. The The 2. The Commission( The Commission( [[r ][oI ][rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V' ]][[oI ][rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V' ]][[rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V' ]][[[Hyderabad']]]2. The Commission( The Commission( [[r ][oI ][rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V' ]][[oI ][rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V' ]][[rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V' ]][[[Hyderabad']]][[naris-e-t ]][[o' ]][Hvderabad'] 2. The Commission( The Commission( [[r ][oI ][rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V' ]][[oI ][rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V' ]][[rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V' ]][[[Hyderabad']]]3. The Additionat [cc ][nmrssiln;' ][;iil;-"i;i;l' ][[naris-e-t ]][[o' ]][Hvderabad'](OPUC)/. one cC to Sn l.r .prasai'5i -sCloi r'r'o"p"rtment 3. The Additionat [cc ][nmrssiln;' ][;iil;-"i;i;l' ][[naris-e-t ]][[o' ]][Hvderabad'](OPUC)/. one cC to Sn l.r .prasai'5i -sCloi r'r'o"p"rtment [[(oPUC)]] i. SllE ;E [i; ][$i ][s*.i ]'*aiii"h'tn' [Advocate ][[(oPUC)]] 6. Two [CD CoPies] 7. One [SPare ][CoPY] Kj \ I DATED:131121202'l r"a 'tI . .'.i:Sj i-A id:.1 ) ''O,o-/,2 ] [ttEf] JUDGMENTITTA.No.636 of 2016 DISPOSING OF THE ['A ] n-bC\Iw\