Case LawHigh Court › Itta/641/2017 Of The Pr.commissioner Of...

Itta/641/2017 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. Vijay Infotech Ventures

High Court 08 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/641/2017 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. Vijay Infotech Ventures
Date of order
08 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/641/2017 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax - 6 v. Vijay Infotech Ventures, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: The issue decided by the Tribunal against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee was whether lease rentals derived from buildings leased out for industrial park have to be treated as business income or not.

Decision: In the light of the above and following the reasons mentioned in the said order, this appeal is also dismissed. ___________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. ___________________________ Date: 08-11-20-17.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No. 641 OF 2017 DATED 08 NOVEMBER, 2017 Between: The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – VI, … Hyderabad Appellant AND Vijay Infotech Ventures, 402, Ground Floor, Surya Towers, Secunderabad … Respondent : Counsel for the appellant Smt. M.Kiranmayee : -- Counsel for the respondent THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:(per Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This appeal by the Revenue is filed against order dated 30-12-2016 in I.T.A.No. 1200/Hyd/2015 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench "B", Hyderabad (for short, 'the Tribunal'). 2. The issue decided by the Tribunal against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee was whether lease rentals derived from buildings leased out for industrial park have to be treated as business income or not. Learned senior standing counsel has fairly submitted that I.T.T.A.No. 615 of 2017 filed against the common order quaI.T.A.No. 1199/Hyd/2015 pertaining to the assessment year 2011-12 concerning the same assessee-respondent was dismissed by this Court confirming the common order which is assailed in this appeal. 3. In the light of the above and following the reasons mentioned in the said order, this appeal is also dismissed. ___________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. ___________________________ Date: 08-11-20-17. CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J. JSK
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan