Itta/642/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Smt Makina Annapurna
High Court
08 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/642/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Smt Makina Annapurna
Date of order
08 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/642/2017 Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Smt Makina Annapurna, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 668 of 2017 has been dismissed, this appeal is also dismissed. ___________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J. ___________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A.No. 642 OF 2017
DATED 08 NOVEMBER, 2017
Between: The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – II, … Visakhapatnam Appellant AND … Smt. Makina Annapurna Respondent : Counsel for the appellant Sri K.Raji Reddy
: -- Counsel for the respondent
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING
JUDGMENT:(per Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
This appeal arises out of common order dated 02-02-2017 to the extent it pertains to I.T.A.No. 625/Vizag/2014 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam.
2. At the hearing, Sri K.Raji Reddy, learned senior standing counsel for Income Tax Department, fairly conceded that this Court has dismissed I.T.T.A.No. 668 of 2017 filed against the same common order which is subject matter of the present appeal quaI.T.A.No. 605/Vizag/2014.
3. As the issues arising in both the sets of appeals are identical, for the same reasons for which I.T.T.A.No. 668 of 2017 has been dismissed, this appeal is also dismissed.
___________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J.
___________________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
Date: 08-11-20-17. JSK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue