Itta/645/2017 Of The Commissionedr Of Income Tax (Central) v. K.v. Srinivasa Rao
High Court
01 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/645/2017 Of The Commissionedr Of Income Tax (Central) v. K.v. Srinivasa Rao
Date of order
01 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/645/2017 Of The Commissionedr Of Income Tax (Central) v. K.v. Srinivasa Rao, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed. ___________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY 01[st] November 2017 DR ___________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
ITTA.No.645 of 2017
Date:01.11.2017
Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Hyderabad. ..... AppellantAnd: K.V.Srinivasa Rao, .....RespondentCounsel for the petitioner: Ms. M.Kiranmayee, For Mr. J.V.Prasad , Senior Standing Counsel for IT Department
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)+
This appeal is filed against order, dated 31.8.2009, in ITANo.411/Vizag/2008 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam.
At the hearing, Ms. M.Kiranmayee, learned senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, submitted that as the value of the appeal is below the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs, as envisaged under Circular No.12/2015, dated 10.12.2015, of the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the appeal is liable to be dismissed.
In the light of the above submission, the appeal is
dismissed.
___________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
01[st] November 2017 DR
___________________________
JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.