Case LawHigh Court › Itta/647/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/647/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd

High Court 29 Oct 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/647/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd
Date of order
29 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/647/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. M/S Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, we dismiss the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. NO.647 OF 2014 DATED:29.10.2014Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-IIIT Towers, A.C. GuardsHyderabad … AppellantAndM/s. Gulf Oil corporation LimitedP.B. No.1, Sanath Nagar (I.E.)Kukatpally P.O., Hyderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) We have heard Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for the appellant, andgone through the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal. We are unable to admit the appeal on any ground as the learned Tribunal found thatthe preconditions for reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income TaxAct, 1961 are not satisfied. This fact finding has been arrived at by the Tribunal inparagraphs 9.5 and 9.6 of the impugned judgment. Hence, we dismiss the appeal. There will be no order as to costs. K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ________________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J29.10.2014 bnr _______________________
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan